วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 25 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2565

--Welcome To Batman8672!Congratulations! A CostcoReward has_arrived!9ZC9


When you build a tool like GMass that brings an entire email marketing platform inside of Gmail, you get to know the Gmail API pretty well. In fact, we're essentially roommates with Gmail, and not roommates who keep their distance from each other — we're like roommates who share a studio apartment. So here in the Gmail API archives page you can find everything we've written about the Gmail API — including difficult problems we solved that you may be able to apply in your developing adventures with Gmail. We're happy to spread the wealth and share our hard-earned Gmail API expertise with you. And hey, come by and visit our studio apartment anytime. Recently, two email industry colleagues independently reported something odd to me. Each composed an email in Gmail, sent it, and it landed in the recipient's Inbox. Each then sent the exact same email using the Gmail API, only to find that the email was going to the recipient's Spam folder. They swore up and down that everything from the Subject to the individual MIME parts were equivalent in both scenarios. How then, would sending directly from Gmail cause one deliverability outcome while sending from the Gmail API cause another? https://www.gmass.co/blog/you-can-now-send-10000-emails-with-gmass-and-gmail/ I'm sure all of these competitors are run by very nice folks and that these platforms are plenty capable of sending an actual test email, but I now appreciate my product even more — I find these tools complex. With GMass, you can install the extension and send a test email in about three seconds. I spent five minutes with each competitor and couldn't figure it out. I'll assume, for now, it's because of my own product bias and not any fault of these likely good email tools. I'll come back another day and run these tests through our competitors, but I suspect that I'll find the same patterns as when sending with GMass. The IP ranges will likely be similar, and any emails sent via these tools with Gmail will have that line referencing gmailapi.google.com. Could one of the biggest puzzles in astrophysics be solved by reworking Albert Einstein's theory of gravity? A new study co-authored by NASA scientists says not yet. The universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, and scientists don't know why. This phenomenon seems to contradict everything researchers understand about gravity's effect on the cosmos: It's as if you threw an apple in the air and it continued upward, faster and faster. The cause of the acceleration, dubbed dark energy, remains a mystery. A new study from the international Dark Energy Survey, using the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope in Chile, marks the latest effort to determine whether this is all simply a misunderstanding: that expectations for how gravity works at the scale of the entire universe are flawed or incomplete. This potential misunderstanding might help scientists explain dark energy. But the study – one of the most precise tests yet of Albert Einstein's theory of gravity at cosmic scales – finds that the current understanding still appears to be correct. The results, authored by a group of scientists that includes some from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, were presented Wednesday, Aug. 23, at the International Conference on Particle Physics and Cosmology (COSMO'22) in Rio de Janeiro. The work helps set the stage for two upcoming space telescopes that will probe our understanding of gravity with even higher precision than the new study and perhaps finally solve the mystery. More than a century ago, Albert Einstein developed his Theory of General Relativity to describe gravity, and so far it has accurately predicted everything from the orbit of Mercury to the existence of black holes. But if this theory can't explain dark energy, some scientists have argued, then maybe they need to modify some of its equations or add new components. To find out if that's the case, members of the Dark Energy Survey looked for evidence that gravity's strength has varied throughout the universe's history or over cosmic distances. A positive finding would indicate that Einstein's theory is incomplete, which might help explain the universe's accelerating expansion. They also examined data from other telescopes in addition to Blanco, including the ESA (European Space Agency) Planck satellite, and reached the same conclusion. The study finds Einstein's theory still works. So no explanation for dark energy yet. But this research will feed into two upcoming missions: ESA's Euclid mission, slated for launch no earlier than 2023, which has contributions from NASA; and NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, targeted for launch no later than May 2027. Both telescopes will search for changes in the strength of gravity over time or distance.
เขียนโดย ที่

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น

สมัครสมาชิก: ส่งความคิดเห็น (Atom)